The protection of diffuse fragmented and collective interests in civil litigation : finding an appropriate compromise, a comparative study of individualistic models and group rights in civil procedure = Der schutz diffuser und kollektiver interessen im zivilprozess : auf der suche nach einem angemessenen kompromiss, eine rechtsvergleichende studie uber individualistische modelle und gruppenrecht im zivilprozess / by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth

Por: Cappelletti, Mauro, 1927-2004Colaborador(es): Habscheid, Walther J, 1924-Tipo de material: TextoTextoBielefeld : Gieseking-Verlag, 1985Descripción: páginas 117-159 ; 21 cmTema(s): ADMINISTRACION JUDICIAL | CAMBIO SOCIAL | DERECHO CIVIL | ORDENAMIENTO JURIDICO | Procedimiento civilClasificación CDD: 346
Contenidos:
Defining the problem: the challenge to traditional views of civil procedure -- Variations on a pluralist theme: Pluralism in governmental enforcement -- Private participation in public enforcement - the relator action in common law countries -- Private actions, especially by organizations -- Class actions, especially in the United States -- Four pluralistic models compared -- Social and political implications of changes in civil procedure: Political power, civil procedure, and social change -- Judicial vs. executive or legislative power -- Private initiatives vs. governmental control -- Problems connected with the Trend Toward more active courts and increasing private initiative on behalf of diffuse interests -- An emerging theme: legality vs. responsability -- The appropiate compromise in comparative perspective.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Signatura Copia número Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Libros General Libros General Colección Carlos Restrepo Piedrahita
Sala General - BICR
346 C18P (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Ej. 1 Disponible (Acceso Disponible) 3571300011682

SOTANO

Defining the problem: the challenge to traditional views of civil procedure -- Variations on a pluralist theme: Pluralism in governmental enforcement -- Private participation in public enforcement - the relator action in common law countries -- Private actions, especially by organizations -- Class actions, especially in the United States -- Four pluralistic models compared -- Social and political implications of changes in civil procedure: Political power, civil procedure, and social change -- Judicial vs. executive or legislative power -- Private initiatives vs. governmental control -- Problems connected with the Trend Toward more active courts and increasing private initiative on behalf of diffuse interests -- An emerging theme: legality vs. responsability -- The appropiate compromise in comparative perspective.

3

No hay comentarios en este titulo.

para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha